The American war with Afghanistan is expected to conclude on May 1, 2021, as per the pact with Zalmay Khalilzad, a Taliban. Former US Donald Trump appointed the American special emissary to Afghanistan. Today, the new US President Joe Bidden retains it. In case, the deadline is achieved, the US would complete her longest battle just a couple of months shy of the two decades’ anniversary of the incursion.
to an article published in Forbes, President
Bidden may extend the presence of American troops in Afghanistan
until November regardless of the argument with the Taliban to withdraw US
troops by May 1.
May 1 Deadline hard to meet?
question is whether the May 1 deadline is met or not. The US government is rambling,
Bidden thinks achieving the deadline is quite difficult and according to
current revelations, the American footstep in Afghanistan is almost 50 percent
bigger than thought previously. Yes, it is 3,500 US troops instead of 2,500.
implies withdrawal logistics will be a bit complex than expected. In the
meantime, the pulsating persistence is that the troops are too early to leave
Afghanistan. Probably, the sturdiest beat in US politics for over 19 years and
as much as four presidential governance is just growing a bit too loud.
must ignore. The US President was a voice of comparative control and a member
of the Obama government. The innate deadline will allow Biden to start
delivering on his promise to put an end to the ongoing wars.
A great opportunity for the US
it comes to the American withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, it won’t be an
easy process; however, maintaining the pact is the ideal predictable choice. It
has the possibility of maintaining some amount of Taliban assistance, to be
honest. This gives the US President a one-off opportunity as far as American
politics are concerned. Moreover, it removes the US from a terribly
counterproductive involvement that would never see the fruits of success.
Taliban assistance not needed for
it comes to Taliban collaboration, the US does not need it for withdrawal, and
depending on the country’s foreign policy options, relying on the whims and
fancies of the Taliban does not seem logical. However, if the American troops
can leave with a US-Taliban agreement to reduce violence to bring more
stability to Afghan politics, such a decision is welcome. Then, breaking the
deadline of May 1 would make that almost unfeasible.
situation is not hard to fathom. As far as broken pledges are concerned, they
do not accelerate diplomatic progress. The Taliban did indicate that how much
stock they out in Washington to honor the May 1 deadline to withdraw the US
troops. Any other kind of alternative discussions outside the purview of
Khalilzad’s negotiation is deemed as a failure.
defiance of the deadline will mean the violation of the pact. A Taliban
negotiator did warn that US troops must not stay beyond May 1 and any violation
will have consequences.